Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: used the Timeout instead of two timeoutHeight and timeoutTimestamp #3732

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

vishal-kanna
Copy link
Contributor

@vishal-kanna vishal-kanna commented Jun 2, 2023

Description

closes: #3727

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@vishal-kanna vishal-kanna changed the title fix: used the Timeout instead of two separate fields fix: used the Timeout instead of two timeoutHeight and timeoutTimestamp Jun 2, 2023
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ func (endpoint *Endpoint) SendPacket(
channelCap := endpoint.Chain.GetChannelCapability(endpoint.ChannelConfig.PortID, endpoint.ChannelID)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can also update the SendPacket api on this endpoint :)

@charleenfei charleenfei mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2023
9 tasks
@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

@vishal-kanna, thank you very much for opening this PR. However, we discussed this internally and as @colin-axner explains in his comment, it might be better to hold on implementing this change for now since it will break IBC applications. So I hope you don't mint, but I will close the PR now. Again, thank you very much for taking the initiative to implement this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

update SendPacket API to use new Timeout type
3 participants